ETFs vs. Mutual Funds

by Mike on October 22, 2007

Recently, Rob Carrick of the Globe and Mail wrote an article in which he compares Canadian equity mutual funds to the iShares Canadian Composite Index Fund (XIC) in terms of performance over the last five years. He discovered that only five mutual funds out of about 100 beat the ETF.

Funds which beat XIC in the last five years:

  1. Acuity All Cap 30 Canadian Equity
  2. imaxx Canadian Equity Growth
  3. Altafund Investment Corp.
  4. TD Canadian Equity
  5. TD Canadian Equity-A

While I would argue that you really need a longer time period and varying conditions (ie bear market) to determine if ETFs are superior to mutual funds, this study raises some interesting questions. If you have an investment advisor who tells you that they can pick top performing mutual fund managers then I would suggest you take a look this list of Canadian equity funds and if you don’t see anything familiar then maybe you should ask your advisor why they didn’t pick one of the top funds. Another good question to ask yourself is why you even need an advisor if you can pick a standard ETF and get better performance.

Questrade Democratic Pricing - 1 cent per share, $4.95 min / $9.95 max

One of the big benefits of Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are the lower management costs which are typically less than 0.5% when compared to mutual funds which normally charge anywhere from about 1.3% to 3% for equity funds. Books such as Four Pillars of Investing and Random Walk Down Wall Street emphasize the fact that these lower costs result in better returns for ETF. Only a minority of mutual funds will beat their index in any given year and the problem is that very few of those funds can continue to beat the index for any length of time. Over time, broad market ETFs will beat the vast majority of mutual funds which makes it very difficult to pick the rare fund that does better than an ETF.

The problem we have as consumers is that we never see any advertising which promote ETFs (since they are low cost after all) but we get bombarded with ads from financial companies which always boast about one or two of their funds which have had superior performance in a recent time period. What you need to figure out is how many funds those companies manage and how many are they advertising? It’s usually a small percentage.

{ 4 trackbacks }

This and That
October 25, 2007 at 11:21 pm
Saturday Morning Update
November 3, 2007 at 8:52 am
Roth Vs Traditional IRA - Amateur Asset Allocator
January 3, 2010 at 12:51 pm
Roth Vs Traditional IRA | Finance Blog
January 6, 2010 at 8:06 am

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Mr. Cheap October 22, 2007 at 3:16 pm

Its always good to remind ourselves of ETF / Index Fund performance and how no one will advertise it to us…

I guess if Canadian Large Caps have been out-performing the index as a whole over the last 5 years that it might be a good time to by Canadian small caps…

2 FourPillars October 22, 2007 at 3:39 pm

Yay, a comment! :)

I personally think the US market is the best one to get into at the moment – the market has taken a few hits, the US$ has dropped – what better time to buy?

Mike

3 moneygardener October 22, 2007 at 4:00 pm

Would be great to see a comparison when markets/resources perform poorly. I think we may see more mutual funds outperform.

4 FourPillars October 22, 2007 at 4:07 pm

MG – I would agree that if there is a big correction – since most mutual funds have at least a small cash holding that should cushion the fall a bit.

I guess the relevant comparison is one that is long term and covers all different kinds of market conditions.

Mike

5 moneygardener October 22, 2007 at 9:24 pm

Another point is that XIC is much too heavily weighted in resources/materials. This is inherently riskier and more cyclical than a mutual fund that has a more balanced asset allocation. The Canadian market can be a dangerous one to index IMO.

6 Four Pillars October 22, 2007 at 10:30 pm

MG – that’s an excellent point as well which I conveniently didn’t mention in the post.

I personally have diversified out of Canada for this very reason. It hasn’t paid off over the last year (which is when I did it) but I know it will pay off in the long run.

Mike

7 Cross the River December 6, 2007 at 2:04 pm

One must remember that the rate of return should not be the only element considered when comparing ETFs to mutul funds. You also have to consider the commission for the purchuse of the ETFs. In order to minimize the overall cost, one should keep etgfs for the longest period of time possible.

PS: great blog!

8 Mr. Cheap December 6, 2007 at 3:17 pm

Good point CtR… thanks!

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: