<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fallacy of Return on Investment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/</link>
	<description>Investing and Personal Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:28:34 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Money Hackers Carnival #9 - Scream Edition!</title>
		<link>http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-5414</link>
		<dc:creator>Money Hackers Carnival #9 - Scream Edition!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/#comment-5414</guid>
		<description>[...] knows a thing or two about return on investment. The original Halloween movie was made for $325,000 back in 1978 and grossed $47 million. Not bad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] knows a thing or two about return on investment. The original Halloween movie was made for $325,000 back in 1978 and grossed $47 million. Not bad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnival of Personal Finance # 145: Baby Education Edition &#124; 8ZU</title>
		<link>http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-5115</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnival of Personal Finance # 145: Baby Education Edition &#124; 8ZU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/#comment-5115</guid>
		<description>[...] Cheap from Quest For Four Pillars explains the Fallacy of Return On Investment, and says, &quot;Return on equity is a more accurate measure than return on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cheap from Quest For Four Pillars explains the Fallacy of Return On Investment, and says, &quot;Return on equity is a more accurate measure than return on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Estate Return On Investment and Leverage &#124; Moolanomy</title>
		<link>http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-4753</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Estate Return On Investment and Leverage &#124; Moolanomy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/#comment-4753</guid>
		<description>[...] The Fallacy of Return on Investment at Quest For Four Pillars [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Fallacy of Return on Investment at Quest For Four Pillars [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnival of Personal Finance # 145: Baby Education Edition &#124; Million Dollar Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-4657</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnival of Personal Finance # 145: Baby Education Edition &#124; Million Dollar Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/#comment-4657</guid>
		<description>[...] Cheap from Quest For Four Pillars explains the Fallacy of Return On Investment, and says, &quot;Return on equity is a more accurate measure than return on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cheap from Quest For Four Pillars explains the Fallacy of Return On Investment, and says, &quot;Return on equity is a more accurate measure than return on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Real Estate Investing Profitable? &#124; I've Paid For This Twice Already...</title>
		<link>http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-4521</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Real Estate Investing Profitable? &#124; I've Paid For This Twice Already...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/#comment-4521</guid>
		<description>[...] Return on investment - not return on equity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Return on investment &#8211; not return on equity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Roundup and Link Love - Going Camping Edition &#124; The Wisdom Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-4438</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Roundup and Link Love - Going Camping Edition &#124; The Wisdom Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/#comment-4438</guid>
		<description>[...] investment is pretty good! But for appreciating assets (like real estate), you might consider a different approach to ROI. Hope everyone enjoys these links and has a great weekend. See you on Monday Morning [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] investment is pretty good! But for appreciating assets (like real estate), you might consider a different approach to ROI. Hope everyone enjoys these links and has a great weekend. See you on Monday Morning [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron@TheWisdomJournal</title>
		<link>http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-4434</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron@TheWisdomJournal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/#comment-4434</guid>
		<description>Preach on my brother!
Would you mind explaining this to our board of directors, the CEO and the VP of Operations where I work?

I can&#039;t seem to get this through their heads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preach on my brother!<br />
Would you mind explaining this to our board of directors, the CEO and the VP of Operations where I work?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t seem to get this through their heads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FinancialJungle</title>
		<link>http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-4427</link>
		<dc:creator>FinancialJungle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/#comment-4427</guid>
		<description>Great explanation, Mr. Cheap.  Mental accounting is probably my #1 pet peeve in personal finance.  Often, people who fall into this trap don&#039;t appreciate your help in getting out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great explanation, Mr. Cheap.  Mental accounting is probably my #1 pet peeve in personal finance.  Often, people who fall into this trap don&#8217;t appreciate your help in getting out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Cheap</title>
		<link>http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-4426</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Cheap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/#comment-4426</guid>
		<description>Elliott:  That becomes the issue in the second example I gave.  For comparing the two condos, just assume they&#039;re both owned outright to keep it simple.  

Leverage can have some funny implications on your calculations (as I tried to show in the second example).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elliott:  That becomes the issue in the second example I gave.  For comparing the two condos, just assume they&#8217;re both owned outright to keep it simple.  </p>
<p>Leverage can have some funny implications on your calculations (as I tried to show in the second example).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/comment-page-1/#comment-4418</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.four-pillars.ca/2008/03/13/the-fallacy-of-return-on-investment/#comment-4418</guid>
		<description>Perhaps im thinking a little too outside the box. But would it not make sense to consider the mortgage amounts as well?

In this example (and i know you wanted to make it simple) there would be totally different mortgages that would represent the buy price. Your ROI should be measured against that - shouldn&#039;t it?

Heh i could totally be wrong btw, this is my first look at ROI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps im thinking a little too outside the box. But would it not make sense to consider the mortgage amounts as well?</p>
<p>In this example (and i know you wanted to make it simple) there would be totally different mortgages that would represent the buy price. Your ROI should be measured against that &#8211; shouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Heh i could totally be wrong btw, this is my first look at ROI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
